https://totallytigers.wordpress.com/2021/11/13/deeper-discussions-7/
DEEPER DISCUSSIONS.
Totally Tigers
On December 1st, the current CBA expires. On the table are numerous negotiations including expansion of the DH role. Currently, the AL uses it but the NL does not.
Over the years, there have been many arguments about whether or not the DH rule should apply to both leagues.
In favor of it is the argument that pitchers focus on throwing, not hitting. They are also now the most expensive components of every team and an injury or HBP while batting is simply too great a risk. Others point to the DH as creating more excitement at the plate as pitchers are not known for their hitting.
On the other side, debate focuses on the value of not having a DH. Supporters point to tradition and the increase in game strategy. Others will add that having an additional player on the team, combined with another salary, could be better spent elsewhere. All are reasons to avoid adopting the DH rule.
How would you vote if accorded one during the CBA negotiations?
Today?s blog addresses this dilemma and allows readers to share their thoughts in more detail. And hopefully, to actively engage with others by responding to their posts and creating back-and-forth discussion threads. The more the merrier!
For this one blog, you?ve got 10 sentences max to share your thoughts.
Of course, you can respond to as many other readers as you want.
TT will supply the ammunition. One thought-provoking question. Several options provided. One hard choice to be selected. One vote.
Ready?
How would you vote on the DH rule for the new CBA?
1. Keep the DH in the AL only.
2. Expand the DH role to include the NL.
VOTE