tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Brady - 63.7% comp % .....not elite lol
Welcome to Detroit Sports Forum!
By joining our community, you'll be able to connect with fellow fans that live and breathe Detroit sports just like you!
-
If you are no longer able to access your account since our recent switch from vBulletin to XenForo, you may need to reset your password via email. If you no longer have access to the email attached to your account, please fill out our contact form and we will assist you ASAP. Thanks for your continued support of DSF.
Stafford
- Thread starter kdp1980
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
But Rodgers is not 65% in 2011, he's 68.3%. And why take Rodgers career vs Staffs best? Plus, AR career is closer to 66%.
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Montana - 63.7% .....again, not elite....right? lol
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
That's a career and its much better than 59.8%.
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
You're arguing career for some guys and taking the best year of another guy. I guess Jamal Lewis is better than Barry. He did have a better year..;-)
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Rodgers career comp % is 65.7%....look it up
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
You said Staff compared to AR.
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
That's what closer to 66 means.
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Bahahahaaaaaa....now youre just being retarded. Good for you bro!! You know exactly what im talking about and you know it. You say 65% isnt elite but i gave you 2 HOF QBs with the same % and you still are fn clueless. Pretty sad.....
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
thought you said 68%m? Whatever....lol
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
You can't compare 1 guys average but the other guys career year. And then say one guy is a elite because he matches the first guys numbers for 1 year..Staff isn't close to AR or Brady.
Last edited:
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Wooooooooooooooo!! You dont get it...i understand now...its so clear lol.
One more fn time!!!
Im not comparing the Staff to Brady , Rodgers, Montana or anyone. Im saying Stafford had a solid comp % of 63+ and you said 'it should be better' with a guy like Best. No it shouldnt because thats a great comp % for the year.
Then you went on to say that 65% is not elite when i gave you similar numbers from QBs like Brady, Rodgers and Montana. One HOF QB and two well on their way. You look stupid arguing this....keep it up though, its enterfntaining..lol
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- Messages
- 55,700
Just admit you're wrong. I really gotta go .. I can't play any longer.
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Youre fn stupid...i get it. My brain itches when i read your fn posts.
Comparing Staff to Rodgers? Only an idiot with a table leg for a brain would think i did that. I compared ONE year of a comp percentage...thats it. Then you said 65% wasnt elite for a QB. I proved you DEAD wrong with 3 HOF QBs.....should i go on to prove how much of a dumbass you are? Stick to the Tigers board, Mitch....seriously....youre just going to hurt yourself more over here...wow
Last edited:
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Brees - 65.6% career comp ...lol
Tony, try understanding Mitch's argument. He makes a good point. You're comparing Stafford's best year to the career averages of some of the best QBs ever. That's not a fair comparison. If Stafford's best year isn't even as good as the other QBs average years, he has a ways to go in order to earn his contract.
tomdalton22
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2011
- Messages
- 25,038
In today's NFL, Stafford should be above 63% if you want to consider him good. There were 11 full time starters with completion % at or above 63%. If you add in Kapernick & Smith as one (since they split time, combined 66.3%) there would be 12. He was 21st in the league (among full time starters) in yards per attempt. He NEEDS to be more efficient in order to be considered a top QB. Right now he is performing at the middle of the pack level. He should be consistantly in the top 10.
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
No no no...lol. He went on to say that Stafford should be better than that. All i said was 60+% is AR territory. Im not comparing the 2 QBs...dont get it twisted....just the numbers, theres a difference. In no way do i think theyre remotely the same. I was merely pointing out his comp % was very good that year and any QB would have taken a 63+% for the year.
Then he went on to say 65% comp % is not elite. That had nothing to do with Stafford. I named 3-4 ELITE QBs that had an avg of 60+%. That number is elite 100%
He was obviously confused what i was trying to point out. Well, i certainly hope he was
Last edited:
tonyballs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,053
Correct. Thats why i said 60+% is considered a solid year. You want your QB reaching those types of numbers and Staff had those numbers for the one year. And yes, he needs to reach those numbers again. Those are top 10 QB numbers.......
Affiliates
