Tired of talking about 2013 and before.....

[tonyballs]

So we drafted Ebron not to improve our offense but to win more, and because we will win more with him we'll have less yards.

And you'll never be happy regardless, right? Geezus Krist bro lol

 

[tonyballs]

It seems we have Concentrated Retards on this board...

And you're the head tard.

 

[cheeno]

It seems we have Concentrated Retards on this board...

Or you could have went with extreme retards. Extreme health is a thing now you know.

 

[tonyballs]

Or you could have went with extreme retards. Extreme health is a thing now you know.

Extremely lol

 

[Mitchrapp]

Did I hear someone suggest a R TE is going to take coverage away from CJ?

:no:

Ebron might be better than Durham and Ross..But come on. Sure let's double team a rook and single cover CJ..:lmao:

 

[tonyballs]

Cause Stafford cant take advantage of 1 v1 coverage opposite CJ. What all you homers keep explaining is on PAPER everything should work out.....what all the realists keep explaining is with CJ Stafford should have ALWAYS been able to take advantage of the side opposite CJ....but he never has. Hes never turned anyone opposite coverage into a weapon. Soooooo now that we have Tate and Ebron MOST of us believe he will continue to do what he always has done......not much but get the ball to CJ and dump it down.

Or maybe, just maybe players like Durham, Ross and Ogletree are pure dogshit. You ever think of that? Even when Burleson was healthy, he was getting his fair share of catches and yards. Your argument is weak as usual. Try again...

 

[tonyballs]

Did I hear someone suggest a R TE is going to take coverage away from CJ?

:no:

Ebron might be better than Durham and Ross..But come on. Sure let's double team a rook and single cover CJ..:lmao:

Again, you blow me away with your knowledge of the game. Not once did i or anybody for that matter say that teams will double-team a rook over CJ. NOT ONCE!! What we were saying is that Ebron HAS to be accounted for, unlike a Pettigrew or whoever and when Ebron releases into the seam, you will see more Safety help over Ebron because Ebron should beat a LB on him 8-10 times. Calvin is ALWAYS going to be doubleteamed but with the additions of Ebron and Tate, CJ should not see it as much.

You're dismissed.

 

[Mitchrapp]

Again, you blow me away with your knowledge of the game. Not once did i or anybody for that matter say that teams will double-team a rook over CJ. NOT ONCE!! What we were saying is that Ebron HAS to be accounted for, unlike a Pettigrew or whoever and when Ebron releases into the seam, you will see more Safety help over Ebron because Ebron should beat a LB on him 8-10 times. Calvin is ALWAYS going to be doubleteamed but with the additions of Ebron and Tate, CJ should not see it as much.

You're dismissed.

What takes coverage away from CJ mean to you? What does he'll make it easier for CJ mean to you. As usual thanks for adding nothing..

 

[cheeno]

Just the presence of Ebron will force honest safety looks....not the rolled to CJ coverages teams play now.

No Tony?

 

[Mitchrapp]

"CJ should not see it as much." -- if the other teams takes a man off CJ because of Ebron or Tate, they're dumb.

 

[tonyballs]

What takes coverage away from CJ mean to you? What does he'll make it easier for CJ mean to you. As usual thanks for adding nothing..

Add nothing??? Listen, you fn clown....just because you don't understand shit about the game of football, don't tell me i'm adding nothing. Lear how to read!!

 

[cheeno]

Again, you blow me away with your knowledge of the game. Not once did i or anybody for that matter say that teams will double-team a rook over CJ. NOT ONCE!! What we were saying is that Ebron HAS to be accounted for, unlike a Pettigrew or whoever and when Ebron releases into the seam, you will see more Safety help over Ebron because Ebron should beat a LB on him 8-10 times. Calvin is ALWAYS going to be doubleteamed but with the additions of Ebron and Tate, CJ should not see it as much.

You're dismissed.

No one is going to make any changes because of "should". Ebron will have to beat his coverage 8-10 times first.

 

[tonyballs]

No Tony?

Huh??

 

[Mitchrapp]

Add nothing??? Listen, you fn clown....just because you don't understand shit about the game of football, don't tell me i'm adding nothing. Lear how to read!!

Great post..thanks for the help :ashamed:

 

[Mitchrapp]

No one is going to make any changes because of "should". Ebron will have to beat his coverage 8-10 times first.

More I believe..if he eventually comes close to Graham then I can understand but his rook year..nope.

 

[Mitchrapp]

If anything he'll take coverage off whoever the third WR is..

 

[cheeno]

More I believe..if he eventually comes close to Graham then I can understand but his rook year..nope.

Exactly my point Mitch. Apparently it's stupid to think or compare him to Jimmy Graham. But then d - coordinators are going to cover him like Jimmy Graham. I think Mayhew broke these guys brains this year with this pick. They all hated it and now have gone into ?ber fan mode to defend it. Which is fine but at least be somewhat logical.

 

[tonyballs]

"CJ should not see it as much." -- if the other teams takes a man off CJ because of Ebron or Tate, they're dumb.

I'm not saying it's going to happen everytime!! Pay attention!! With the additions of two possible studs in this type of offense, we're going to see a ton of mismatches. Some with CJ and mostly with Tate and Ebron. Teams will be forced "at times" to roll coverage off Calvin because Tate and Ebron will be crushing it. When that happens, Calvin will have more single coverage.

Do you fn understand now for fk sakes?!

 

[cheeno]

If anything he'll take coverage off whoever the third WR is..

If he's taking coverage off anyone or even helping out the run game, he's putting up some mad stats first.

 

[cheeno]

Teams will be forced "at times" to roll coverage off Calvin because Tate and Ebron will be crushing it.

3 rec 40 yards...crushing it.